19 Sep Dating Nerves After a Long Marriage: Why They Happen and What Helps
Almost everyone dating again after a long marriage reports the same thing about the first meeting: a level of nerves entirely out of proportion to a cup of coffee with a stranger.
This is ordinary and it is not a sign that you are doing it too soon. It has a specific cause, and understanding the cause takes most of the weight out of it.

Why it is worse than you expected
The last time you did this you were twenty-five and the stakes were low. You had time, an unformed life, and no evidence that things end badly.
Now you have a marriage behind you that did not work, a life you have rebuilt at some cost, and a clear sense of what a wrong decision costs in years. The nerves are not irrational. They are an accurate response to knowing more than you used to.
There is also the simple matter of practice. You have not done this in two decades, and anything unpractised feels harder than it is.
What the nerves are usually about
Being evaluated. Particularly on appearance, and particularly if the last person who saw you daily is no longer in your life. This is the most common and the least founded, because the other person is far too preoccupied with their own version of it to be conducting an assessment.
Having nothing to say. Reliably untrue. Two adults with decades of life behind them do not run out of material in ninety minutes.
Being asked about the marriage. Worth preparing two sentences for, so the question does not land cold. Not a confession, just a plain account you are comfortable saying out loud.
That it will go well. Less discussed and quite common. A good first meeting means the thing is now real, which is its own disturbance.
What actually helps
Make the meeting smaller
Coffee at five, not dinner at eight. An hour, with somewhere to be afterwards, stated in advance.
A shorter meeting with a clear end removes most of the pressure, and it removes the problem of being trapped across a table for three hours with someone you knew within ten minutes was not right. Nobody has ever regretted making a first meeting shorter.
Give yourself one job
Not to be impressive. Not to determine whether this is the person. One job: find out whether you would like to spend another hour with them.
That question is answerable in an hour. The larger one is not, and trying to answer it at a first meeting is most of what makes first meetings unbearable.
Ask about them, and listen to the answer
Nerves are largely self-attention. Genuine curiosity about the person opposite is the most reliable way out, and it has the side effect of making you better company.
What to ask is a subject of its own, and we set out the useful version in our note on what to talk about on a first date.
Expect the first few to be awkward and count them as practice
The first meeting after a long absence is rarely the good one. The third is noticeably easier than the first, for reasons that have nothing to do with who you met.
People who abandon the whole enterprise after two uncomfortable coffees are usually judging a skill by its first attempt.
Reduce the number of meetings, not the nerves
Some of the strain is volume. Meeting a great many people who were never plausible is exhausting in a way that has nothing to do with confidence, and it is the main reason people give up.
Fewer, better-founded meetings is easier on everyone, which is part of why the app model suits this stage of life poorly. The pattern is common enough that we have written about what tends to follow it.
Things that do not help
A drink beforehand. Understandable and it reliably makes the meeting worse.
Extensive research on the person. A basic check is sensible. An hour of reading about them produces a version in your head that the actual meeting then has to contend with.
Rehearsing answers. Prepared material sounds prepared. The two sentences about the marriage are worth having; a script is not.
Waiting to feel ready. Nerves before a first meeting do not resolve in advance. They resolve by meeting someone.
Frequently asked questions
Is it obvious to the other person that I am nervous?
Far less than it feels. People consistently overestimate how visible their own nerves are. And the other person is usually managing the same thing, which is worth remembering when you read their awkwardness as disinterest.
Should I admit I am nervous?
A brief, light acknowledgement early on tends to help both of you and costs nothing. Saying it once is disarming. Returning to it repeatedly becomes the subject of the evening.
What if I freeze and it goes badly?
Then one meeting went badly, which is a small cost and quite recoverable. If you liked them, a short honest message afterwards saying you were more nervous than you expected is usually received well, because the other person has almost certainly had the same experience.
How long should I wait until the nerves settle before starting?
They will not settle first, so this is not a useful threshold. A better one is whether you can describe the end of the marriage without it consuming the conversation, which is a question about readiness rather than nerves.
When is this more than ordinary nerves?
When it persists well beyond the meeting itself, affects sleep or work, or you find you are cancelling repeatedly rather than attending and finding it uncomfortable. That is worth raising with a doctor or a therapist rather than managing alone, and it is a different thing from being apprehensive about a coffee.
Fewer meetings, better founded
Most of the strain described here scales with the number of unpromising meetings you have to sit through. When someone else has established in advance that the person is who they say they are, wants the same thing, and is at a comparable point in their life, the meeting itself carries far less weight. That is the practical argument for working with a matchmaker rather than searching alone, and if it suits how you would rather do this, you can start with an application.
No Comments