20 Aug How Matchmaker Vetting Actually Works
Every matchmaking firm says it screens the people it introduces. It is the most repeated sentence in the category and the least examined. Nobody says who does the screening, what is checked, how long it takes, or what it fails to catch.
So here is that. Vetting is one step of a longer process, and the full sequence is set out in what a matchmaker actually does. This page stays inside the single step.
Why the claim gets made, and why it is empty
It answers a real fear. Pew Research Center found that half of online daters say people setting up fake accounts in order to scam others is very common, and that 46% of Americans think dating sites and apps are not a safe way to meet people.
But the sentence is unfalsifiable. A firm that glances at a driver’s license and a firm that spends half a day per candidate can both write it on a web page, and the buyer cannot tell them apart. So the useful question is never “do you screen people.” It is “what specifically, and how would I know.”
What can actually be established about a candidate
Four things, roughly, and they are not equally solid.
Identity. That the person is a real human being whose legal name and face match a government-issued document. This is the easiest of the four and the most important, because it is the floor under everything else. The Federal Trade Commission’s guidance on romance scams tells consumers to do a reverse image search of the person’s profile picture for exactly this reason. A firm that meets people in an office clears that bar in a way an app cannot.
Availability. Whether the person is legally free to date. Marriage and divorce records sit at the county level and are not uniformly accessible, so this is part records and part conversation, and the conversation is often the better instrument. Being mid-divorce is not a lie, but it is a fact a client should hear first.
Occupation. Easier than people assume for regulated professions, since state licensing boards for medicine, law, real estate and accounting publish registries. Harder for anyone self-employed, where a firm is confirming plausibility rather than fact.
Public record. Court and criminal records sit at county and state level, in separate systems with different rules. What a search returns depends on which counties were searched. That is a real limit, not a technicality.
What it costs the firm, which is the part nobody publishes
Time, and more of it than the finished introduction suggests. One candidate can absorb a records search across more than one county, calls that mostly go unreturned, cross-checking what was said against what is publicly visible, and the meeting itself, which runs an hour or more before travel and write-up.
Two consequences. Depth varies enormously between firms, because vetting is the least visible cost in the business and the easiest to quietly reduce. Nothing about a finished introduction reveals whether the work was done.
And verification has a shelf life. Somebody confirmed single in March may not be in September, and nobody calls a matchmaker to report that they have started seeing someone. Keeping a roster accurate means repeating work on people already checked.
What the law permits, which is less than most people assume
People assume a firm can order a full background report on anyone it likes. It cannot, and the constraint is federal.
Once a consumer reporting agency is involved, the Fair Credit Reporting Act applies. It says an agency may furnish a consumer report under the listed circumstances “and no other”, and among them is the written instructions of the consumer the report is about. The realistic route to a regulated report runs through the candidate’s own signed authorization.
Contents are limited too. Federal law bars a consumer reporting agency from including civil suits, civil judgments and records of arrest that antedate the report by more than seven years, subject to stated exceptions. A report is a window, not a biography.
The clearest official statement of what screening cannot do comes from a state legislature. New Jersey requires an internet dating service that runs criminal background screenings to disclose that such screenings are not foolproof, that they may give members a false sense of security, that criminals may circumvent even the most sophisticated search technology, that not all criminal records are public in all states and not all databases are up to date, and that only publicly available convictions are included. A service that does not screen at all must say so clearly and conspicuously.
Locally, what a client signs is a dating service contract, a category defined in California Civil Code section 1694 to include personal introductions provided at the seller’s place of business. Verbal promises about screening belong in that document.
What vetting cannot tell you
This is the part that gets left out, so it goes in plainly.
Verification can establish that someone is who they say they are and is genuinely available. It cannot establish that they will be kind to you. It cannot establish that they are ready, which is a different thing from being single and is the more common cause of a bad introduction. No record search returns a result for emotional availability, and no reference call reliably separates a person who wants a relationship from a person who wants company on a Thursday.
Vetting is backward-looking by construction. A clean record is a fact about history, not a prediction.
What it removes is a category of problem: the person who does not exist, the person who is married, the person whose stated life does not survive ten minutes of checking. That is worth removing, and it is not the same as safety. A firm that lets you believe otherwise has told you something untrue by omission.
How to ask a firm about vetting without getting a slogan
Six questions, and they work on any firm in the city. Who performs the vetting, the matchmaker or an assistant. What specifically is confirmed, item by item, rather than the word “screened.” Is the candidate met in person before an introduction is proposed. Is anything re-checked after months on the roster. What happens if something turns up, and who decides. And the question that separates firms: what are you not able to verify.
A firm that answers that last one with a straight list is more likely to be doing the work than a firm that treats it as an insult. Assessing a firm as a whole is a wider job, covered in how to choose a reputable matchmaker.
How this works at Los Angeles Singles
We are not going to publish a checklist you cannot audit, because that is the same empty claim in longer form. What we will say is this. Our matchmakers meet people. Every introduction is considered by a real matchmaker who weighs compatibility, readiness, communication style and long-term potential rather than surface preferences. There is no public profile and no searchable database, and what you tell us is handled discreetly. Anything more specific belongs in a conversation where you can ask follow-up questions, which is how our professional matchmaking service is structured.
We are one credible option among several in this city, and the six questions above are what we would want you asking us.
Frequently asked questions
Do matchmakers run criminal background checks?
Some do, some do not, and practice varies more than the marketing suggests. Where a consumer reporting agency is involved, the Fair Credit Reporting Act limits when a report may be furnished at all, and the practical route runs through the candidate’s own written authorization. Firms that do not use a reporting agency rely on public court records, which vary by county and state. Ask what the screening covers and whether that answer appears in the contract.
How does a matchmaker confirm that someone is actually single?
Partly through records and partly through conversation. Marriage and divorce records sit at the county level and are not uniformly accessible, so a firm relying on records alone will miss things. Sitting with a person, asking directly, and asking again a different way weeks later tends to be more reliable. It is worth separating two questions that get merged: whether someone is legally free to date, and whether they are finished with the last relationship. Only the first can be documented.
What can vetting not establish?
Character and readiness. Verification can confirm that a person exists, is who they claim to be, and is available. It cannot confirm that they will be considerate, that they are over a divorce, or that they want the same thing next month. It describes a past rather than predicting behavior. A firm presenting screening as a safety promise rather than as risk reduction is overselling it.
Will I be told what was verified about the person I am meeting?
You should be able to ask, and you should get specifics rather than reassurance. A reasonable request is to know which items were confirmed, how recently, and what was not confirmed. Most firms withhold full names, employers and sometimes photographs until both people agree to meet, which is a privacy arrangement rather than a gap in the vetting, and it works in your favor too.
Is my own information checked, and who sees it?
Yes, and it should be. A firm that verifies candidates but not clients is running an incomplete process, since every client is somebody else’s candidate. Ask how your information is stored, who inside the firm can see it, what is shared with the person you are introduced to and when, and whether anything about you appears anywhere public. At Los Angeles Singles there is no public profile and no searchable database.
Ready to talk?
If you want to ask these questions of a real matchmaker rather than a web page, you can start with an application. The consultation that follows is the place to press on any of it.
No Comments